Just an update on how many people have now signed the petition and what has happened to the signatures.
2287 have now been tabled in Parliament.
Additionally, there are a further 236 in the electorate office that have come in this week
So now over 2,500 have signed the petition!
Kind Regards
Danny Michell - Electorate Officer
Office of Jane Garrett MP - State Member for Brunswick
A website for local residents opposed to the building of a new 66kv Terminal station on the site of the existing Brunswick Terminal Station at 46 King St, Fitzroy North Vic 3068.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Ceres Autumn Harvest Festival this Sat 31 Mar.
Come down to the Ceres Autumn Harvest Festival this Sat 31 Mar. We will have a stall setup so that you can find out more about the BTS 66 issue and sign the petition.
http://www.ceres.org.au/Harvest
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Brunswick terminal battle: Moreland calls in legal eagles
BY CHRIS HINGSTON
20 Mar, 2012 04:00 AM
MORELAND City Council will urgently seek legal advice to reverse the Brunswick Terminal Station expansion.The council wants to explore options should it decide to fight Planning Minister Matthew Guy's decision to approve the terminal upgrade.
Moreland City council will also ask Yarra and Darebin councils for support on the decision to seek legal counsel.
Last month Mr Guy approved the $271 million terminal expansion, rezoning the land from residential to special use.
Mr Guy said the decision ensured the security of electricity supply to Melbourne's inner-east and the CBD.
Proposals to upgrade the terminal station had twice been rejected by Moreland City Council's planning committee.
Last week the council agreed to allocate up to $5000 to seek counsel on the legality of Mr Guy's decision, to see if any options existed to fight the expansion.
The motion was put forward by South Ward councillor Lambros Tapinos, who said he was shocked and appalled by Mr Guy's decision to rezone the land.
"What the minister has done is effectively change the rules," he said.
Yarra City mayor Geoff Barbour said all funding requests would have to be considered at a council meeting.
"Yarra has plenty of its own planning battles but we know many of our residents are concerned about this one on our doorstep," he said.
"If we are not able to provide funding for the legal advice, we will continue to support the community campaign in other ways," he said.
Mr Guy's office declined to comment.
LINK TO ORIGINAL MELBOURNE TIMES ARTICLE
Monday, March 19, 2012
Moreland Council Takes Action On BTS Rezoning
Congratulations to Moreland Council for taking a strong stand about the rezoning of the BTS site. At the March Council meeting on March 15 it took a decision along the following lines:
Moreland City Council is shocked and appalled at the decision made by the Victorian Planning Minister, Matthew Guy, on February 15 2012 to unilaterally rezone the Brunswick Terminal Station site from 'Residential 1', to 'Special Use Zone' giving the go-ahead for the Terminal Station's redevelopment and quadrupling of its capacity. Moreland City Council, as the statutory planning authority, has twice considered and rejected this planning proposal due to environmental, health and community concerns and as it is a totally inappropriate development in a residential area and bounding the Merri Creek Linear Parklands.
The rezoning of the site has the intent of preventing any further administrative or judicial review. As this decision removes Moreland City Council as the planning authority, Council must determine what future actions are open to it to prevent this totally inappropriate development from taking place. Therefore it is moved:
"i) that Council seek a Legal Opinion, as a matter of urgency, from a suitably and experienced Legal Counsel about the legality of the Minister's decision and to establish if there are avenues Council can realistically pursue. An amount of up to $5,000 be allocated for such an Opinion. Council will then decide on any future action it may take based on this Opinion.
ii) the neighbouring municipalities of Darebin and Yarra border on the Terminal Station site which also adversely impacts on their residents. Moreland Council calls on these 2 neighbouring Councils to join with Moreland in seeking a Legal Opinion about the legality of the rezoning and invites them to contribute to the cost of the Opinion thereby making it a joint undertaking of the 3 affected inner-urban Councils on behalf of their residents. A letter encompassing this preamble and motion should be sent by the Mayor to Darebin and Yarra Councils requesting their involvement.
iii) Up to 2 representatives of the Merri Creek Residents Group be invited to participate in the preliminary briefing of the Legal Counsel.
iv) a copy of this preamble and motion be sent to Jane Garrett MLA, Kelvin Thompson MHR, Fiona Richardson MLA, Adam Bandt MHR, Jenny Mikakos MLC, Shadow Minister for Planning Brian Tee MLC and the Merri Creek Residents Group."
While this may not be the exact wording of Council's resolution, it is expected to be close. Hopefully the Residents Group will be hearing from Council soon. People who know Darebin and Yarra councillors should be encouraged to urge these 2 cities to join Moreland's initiative.
Moreland City Council is shocked and appalled at the decision made by the Victorian Planning Minister, Matthew Guy, on February 15 2012 to unilaterally rezone the Brunswick Terminal Station site from 'Residential 1', to 'Special Use Zone' giving the go-ahead for the Terminal Station's redevelopment and quadrupling of its capacity. Moreland City Council, as the statutory planning authority, has twice considered and rejected this planning proposal due to environmental, health and community concerns and as it is a totally inappropriate development in a residential area and bounding the Merri Creek Linear Parklands.
The rezoning of the site has the intent of preventing any further administrative or judicial review. As this decision removes Moreland City Council as the planning authority, Council must determine what future actions are open to it to prevent this totally inappropriate development from taking place. Therefore it is moved:
"i) that Council seek a Legal Opinion, as a matter of urgency, from a suitably and experienced Legal Counsel about the legality of the Minister's decision and to establish if there are avenues Council can realistically pursue. An amount of up to $5,000 be allocated for such an Opinion. Council will then decide on any future action it may take based on this Opinion.
ii) the neighbouring municipalities of Darebin and Yarra border on the Terminal Station site which also adversely impacts on their residents. Moreland Council calls on these 2 neighbouring Councils to join with Moreland in seeking a Legal Opinion about the legality of the rezoning and invites them to contribute to the cost of the Opinion thereby making it a joint undertaking of the 3 affected inner-urban Councils on behalf of their residents. A letter encompassing this preamble and motion should be sent by the Mayor to Darebin and Yarra Councils requesting their involvement.
iii) Up to 2 representatives of the Merri Creek Residents Group be invited to participate in the preliminary briefing of the Legal Counsel.
iv) a copy of this preamble and motion be sent to Jane Garrett MLA, Kelvin Thompson MHR, Fiona Richardson MLA, Adam Bandt MHR, Jenny Mikakos MLC, Shadow Minister for Planning Brian Tee MLC and the Merri Creek Residents Group."
While this may not be the exact wording of Council's resolution, it is expected to be close. Hopefully the Residents Group will be hearing from Council soon. People who know Darebin and Yarra councillors should be encouraged to urge these 2 cities to join Moreland's initiative.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Support for resident summit with Premier on Brunswick Terminal Station
08 March 2012
Yarra Council is calling on the Victorian Premier to meet with residents who are deeply concerned by the Planning Minister’s approval of an expanded electricity substation in Brunswick.
Mayor Geoff Barbour said Council had resolved at its meeting on Tuesday night to write to Premier Ted Baillieu requesting that he meet with representatives of the Merri Creek Residents Group to discuss the community impacts of the Minister’s decision.
Cr Barbour said while the electricity substation was in neighbouring Moreland, many Yarra residents were concerned about the potential health and environmental impacts of expanding the substation.
“We don’t think it is asking too much for the Premier to sit down with residents and really listen to their concerns," Cr Barbour said.
He said Yarra Council was horrified that the Planning Minister had intervened to approve a controversial development that had been refused by Moreland Council.
“Councils are the best barometer of how a community feels on an issue, so to override a Council decision is to override the community’s wishes,” he said.
Read the story in full here.Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Call for Volunteers
The NOBTS66 campaign is seeking volunteers to help IMMEDIATELY with distributing petitions and collecting signatures. We have a list of schools, kinders, cafes and other organisations along the transmission lines and in the local area that need to be contacted and have petitions dropped off. If you can spare an hour or more of your time it would be GREATLY appreciated. Please call Liz Shackleton directly on 0415 824 593 or email liz.shackleton@mac.com if you are able to help.
Also we are currently printing up NOBTS66 campaign posters so you will soon have the opportunity to purchase one and put it in your front yard (or wherever else you wish!) This is the time to make your views known – it’s NOT SAFE, NOT RIGHT and NOT ON!
Finally thanks to all those residents who turned up at super short notice for filming of the Channel 7 news story on Saturday. It made a big impact and the footage is getting sent far and wide.
The Merri Creek Residents Group
Also we are currently printing up NOBTS66 campaign posters so you will soon have the opportunity to purchase one and put it in your front yard (or wherever else you wish!) This is the time to make your views known – it’s NOT SAFE, NOT RIGHT and NOT ON!
Finally thanks to all those residents who turned up at super short notice for filming of the Channel 7 news story on Saturday. It made a big impact and the footage is getting sent far and wide.
The Merri Creek Residents Group
Monday, March 5, 2012
Letter to the Premier from Adam Bandt
Adam Bandt has written to the Premier. Read the full letter by downloading the pdf here
Dear Premier,
Re: Brunswick Terminal Station
Residents in the northern part of my electorate of Melbourne have expressed to me their dismay and concern about the decision on 15 February of the Victorian Minister for Planning to rezone the land on which the Brunswick Terminal Station is located and approve the building of a new 66kV terminal station.
Channel 7 TV News coverage
To see the Channel 7 news coverage of the No BTS 66 campaign click the link below
http://au.news.yahoo.com/
http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/national/-/watch/28495970/residents-show-own-power/
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Government claims debating the BTS issue in Parliament ‘a waste of their time’
The Minister’s decision to rezone the BTS and allow the development to proceed was ‘debated’ in the Upper House of State Parliament earlier this week. While Labor and Greens members took the disallowance motion seriously, it is clear that Government members treated the whole issue as an annoyance, and us – their constituents – with contempt. The Minister didn’t even bother to speak on the issue, his comments restricted to interjecting when other members were speaking and encouraging Liberal members to turn the debate into a farce. See full transcript below (if you can bear seeing how appalling the level of ‘debate’ is in our State Parliament). In summary, Opposition Spokesman for Planning, Brian Tee moved a motion to disallow the Ministers decision, and this was supported by Greg Barber (Greens), Jenny Mikakos (Labor) and Nasi Elasmar (Labor). Naturally the government won the vote at the end of the ‘debate’ given they have more members in the Upper House.
However before voting, Government members ridiculed Labor members for bringing this matter before Parliament, claiming that such a tedious issue should be dealt with at Council or VCAT (didn’t they know it already had been rejected by Council, and the Minister stopped it from going before VCAT?) and that they had more important things to be debating. They also claimed that it was fully acceptable for residents living near proposed Wind Turbines to have power of veto if they lived within 2km of such a facility, but that residents living in Melbourne’s inner north had no such rights when it came to electricity terminals and high voltage transmission lines and that we were raising this as a frivolous issue to waste their time – and that Labor members were ‘scaremongering’. Of greatest concern is the number of times that Government members claimed the Regulatory Test Process had thoroughly investigated the issue and shown that there was a ‘net benefit’ from siting the new terminal at the BTS. The Reg Test shows no such thing – merely that it is the most cost effective option (which remains debatable) when you don’t take into consideration any environmental, health, safety or amenity issues.
This ‘debate’ shows just how much contempt the Minister and his colleagues have for local residents and Moreland Council – and only reaffirms our resolve to stop this bad decision being implemented.
Chris Black
Read the first debate here - http://bit.ly/xwnchT
Debate adjourned and then resumed here - http://bit.ly/zlzg96
However before voting, Government members ridiculed Labor members for bringing this matter before Parliament, claiming that such a tedious issue should be dealt with at Council or VCAT (didn’t they know it already had been rejected by Council, and the Minister stopped it from going before VCAT?) and that they had more important things to be debating. They also claimed that it was fully acceptable for residents living near proposed Wind Turbines to have power of veto if they lived within 2km of such a facility, but that residents living in Melbourne’s inner north had no such rights when it came to electricity terminals and high voltage transmission lines and that we were raising this as a frivolous issue to waste their time – and that Labor members were ‘scaremongering’. Of greatest concern is the number of times that Government members claimed the Regulatory Test Process had thoroughly investigated the issue and shown that there was a ‘net benefit’ from siting the new terminal at the BTS. The Reg Test shows no such thing – merely that it is the most cost effective option (which remains debatable) when you don’t take into consideration any environmental, health, safety or amenity issues.
This ‘debate’ shows just how much contempt the Minister and his colleagues have for local residents and Moreland Council – and only reaffirms our resolve to stop this bad decision being implemented.
Chris Black
Read the first debate here - http://bit.ly/xwnchT
Debate adjourned and then resumed here - http://bit.ly/zlzg96
Friday, March 2, 2012
The No BTS 66 Fact Sheet
NO BTS 66 Fact sheet. If you are wondering what stage the Brunswick Terminal Station is at here's the latest fact sheet.
Download a pdf here
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Adam Bandt raises the BTS66 issue in Parliament Wednesday, 29 February 2012
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
PROOF
Federation Chamber
CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS
Melbourne Electorate: Energy Infrastructure
SPEECH
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SPEECH
Date Wednesday, 29 February 2012 Source House
Page 107 Proof Yes
Questioner Responder
Speaker Bandt, Adam, MP Question No.
Mr BANDT (Melbourne) (09:57): Sustainable power supply should not come at the price of people's health or the cost of their amenity. With my Greens colleagues we have effectively facilitated a national focus on clean, renewable energy. I am now turning close attention to the impact of energy infrastructure on communities.
Residents in my electorate of Melbourne are facing the prospect of living alongside a 66-kilovolt terminal station, plans for which have been granted executive approval by the Baillieu government. I note that the member for Wills is in the chamber too and I am glad he is, because I know he has raised this issue as well. Already cohabiting with a 22-kilovolt facility, residents are rightly concerned about the intervention to approve the expansion and bypass the scrutiny of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Chris Black, Ramon Collodetti and other members of the Merri Creek Residents Group have been campaigning tirelessly for their community, and on their behalf I am now continuing to bring to the attention of the federal parliament the following concerns about the proposal.
Firstly, the requisite regulatory test provides insufficient scrutiny of the social impacts of the facility and does not require independent analysis of the health and safety risks. I have written to the Minister for Resources and Energy to bring his attention to this. Secondly, residents are rightly concerned about the current absence of Australian standards for exposure to electromagnetic fields. The draft standard has not yet been approved, leaving open the possibility of an unsafe environment for families. Furthermore, debates about the safety of the
proposed facility and the appropriate EMF levels have focused on international standards for critical exposure rather than chronic exposure. While the predicted EMF levels may fall beneath international standards for critical exposure, residents will be in streets registering EMF levels of four to eight to milligauss. Over time, levels above three milligauss correlate with a higher risk of childhood leukaemia. There are also concerns for children living under the high voltage line further down the line in the electorate of the member for Batman. One report on this site suggests that warning signs can be installed to deal with high magnetic field values on that footpath immediately above the underground cables—poor comfort for the residents who are using these footpaths daily.
I have written to the health minister to request immediate advice on the progress of the standards.
Thirdly, the intervention by the Victorian government has denied residents their right to participate in the planning process. I have written to the Premier expressing my concerns.
Fourthly, expansion of the terminal is based on outdated data regarding power consumption in Melbourne and is inconsistent with the reformation of the National Electricity Market to remove the bias towards centralised coal fired power generation and encourage demand management and the development of distributed generation and renewable energy. Ironically, the unique
Moreland Energy Foundation, with its forward-thinking plan to make Melbourne self-sufficient in energy supply through the introduction of cogeneration, takes in Brunswick and the site of this facility. I join with residents to call for an immediate independent review of this proposal.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER ( Ms AE Burke ): Order! In accordance with standing order 193 the time for constituency statements has concluded.
PROOF
Federation Chamber
CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS
Melbourne Electorate: Energy Infrastructure
SPEECH
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SPEECH
Date Wednesday, 29 February 2012 Source House
Page 107 Proof Yes
Questioner Responder
Speaker Bandt, Adam, MP Question No.
Mr BANDT (Melbourne) (09:57): Sustainable power supply should not come at the price of people's health or the cost of their amenity. With my Greens colleagues we have effectively facilitated a national focus on clean, renewable energy. I am now turning close attention to the impact of energy infrastructure on communities.
Residents in my electorate of Melbourne are facing the prospect of living alongside a 66-kilovolt terminal station, plans for which have been granted executive approval by the Baillieu government. I note that the member for Wills is in the chamber too and I am glad he is, because I know he has raised this issue as well. Already cohabiting with a 22-kilovolt facility, residents are rightly concerned about the intervention to approve the expansion and bypass the scrutiny of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Chris Black, Ramon Collodetti and other members of the Merri Creek Residents Group have been campaigning tirelessly for their community, and on their behalf I am now continuing to bring to the attention of the federal parliament the following concerns about the proposal.
Firstly, the requisite regulatory test provides insufficient scrutiny of the social impacts of the facility and does not require independent analysis of the health and safety risks. I have written to the Minister for Resources and Energy to bring his attention to this. Secondly, residents are rightly concerned about the current absence of Australian standards for exposure to electromagnetic fields. The draft standard has not yet been approved, leaving open the possibility of an unsafe environment for families. Furthermore, debates about the safety of the
proposed facility and the appropriate EMF levels have focused on international standards for critical exposure rather than chronic exposure. While the predicted EMF levels may fall beneath international standards for critical exposure, residents will be in streets registering EMF levels of four to eight to milligauss. Over time, levels above three milligauss correlate with a higher risk of childhood leukaemia. There are also concerns for children living under the high voltage line further down the line in the electorate of the member for Batman. One report on this site suggests that warning signs can be installed to deal with high magnetic field values on that footpath immediately above the underground cables—poor comfort for the residents who are using these footpaths daily.
I have written to the health minister to request immediate advice on the progress of the standards.
Thirdly, the intervention by the Victorian government has denied residents their right to participate in the planning process. I have written to the Premier expressing my concerns.
Fourthly, expansion of the terminal is based on outdated data regarding power consumption in Melbourne and is inconsistent with the reformation of the National Electricity Market to remove the bias towards centralised coal fired power generation and encourage demand management and the development of distributed generation and renewable energy. Ironically, the unique
Moreland Energy Foundation, with its forward-thinking plan to make Melbourne self-sufficient in energy supply through the introduction of cogeneration, takes in Brunswick and the site of this facility. I join with residents to call for an immediate independent review of this proposal.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER ( Ms AE Burke ): Order! In accordance with standing order 193 the time for constituency statements has concluded.
Support from Moreland Council
Councillor John Kavanagh the Moreland Mayor has written to the Premier Ted Baillieu urging him to meet with the members of the Merri Creek Residents Group to discuss the BTS upgrade.
You can click on the image to read the letter or download a pdf here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)